tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-155049022009-02-21T05:35:12.207-08:00D. Erskine Cummin-gshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17911961709989550385noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15504902.post-1124266934398343852005-08-17T00:42:00.000-07:002005-08-17T01:22:14.406-07:00<strong><span style="font-size:85%;"> THIS 3rd. OF A SERIES BY D. Erskine Cummings RE FALSE IMPRISONMENT IN THE GULAG OF AMERIKA FOR 249 DAYS FOR DOLING OUT 8OO-TEL-JURY info, a 1st. Amendment right. </span></strong><br /><strong><span style="font-size:85%;"> FIRST SEE OTHER HERE IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY.</span></strong><br /> #<span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>1. is 8.5" X 11" leaflet I handed out, my CRIME?! @</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong><a href="http://www.patriotnetwork.info/FullyIJ.htm">www.patriotnetwork.info/FullyIJ.htm</a> </strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong> #2 Is my first blogspot: <a href="http://l00kl00selipssinkships.blogspot.com">http://l00kl00selipssinkships.blogspot.com</a> </strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong> #3 Is the 2nd. blog: <a href="http://ruasmart12.blogspot.com">http://ruasmart12.blogspot.com</a> Address for this, 3rd. blogspot is:</strong></span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong>#4 <a href="http://l00kingforattorney.blogspot.com">http://l00kingforattorney.blogspot.com</a> </strong></span><br /><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong> FOLLOWS ARE CITES FROM "A TREATISE ON ARREST & FALSE IMPRISONMENT" BY C. WEISMAN, ISBN 1-929205-06-2 Copyright 1993-96 PO 22405, Eagan, Mn. 55122<br /></strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong> Recall from prior blog that I had no criminal record per FBI report on 3 Dec/2003.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong> Chapt. 8, Distortion of Fundamental Law. Pg. 69, Handcuffing; The people's lack of understanding...has allowed government to establish many unlawful & oppressive procedures...use of handcuffs is an example of this.</strong></span><br /><span style="font-family:arial;"><strong> The practice of physical restraint by handcuffing, leg-irons, rope, straight-jackets & the like has historically been limited to those who had committed the most severe crimes, such as felonies, or have exhibited a violent temperment. In book 51 of the Lawyers Reports Annotated, p. 216, are listed several cases which show the rule pertaining to handcuffing procedures "must depend upon the circumstance of each particular case." SEE #33, Caperton v. Commonwealth, 189 Ky. 652, 655, 225 </strong></span><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/15504902-112426693439834385?l=l00kingforattorney.blogspot.com'/></div>D. Erskine Cummin-gshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17911961709989550385noreply@blogger.com3